Varunkumar Sagarkar, Director, Desapex
Construction
is moving from drawings and delays to data-led delivery. Varunkumar
Sagarkar, Director, shares how Desapex is helping developers and
contractors make BIM, ISO 19650 and digital twins work on real projects.
How is Desapex helping construction companies move from traditional
project delivery to digital-first execution?
When we started, the first challenge was capacity. We saw strong
adoption of digital technology in markets such as the Middle East, Europe and
the US, but India lacked the depth of resources required to deliver those
services at scale. Over time, we also saw many failed BIM and digital
transformation projects. That made companies hesitant. The problem was that
adoption was often technology-led, without a standard operating process. At Desapex,
we use ISO 19650 as a framework across design, construction, asset management
and operations. Technology is only an enabler; the real shift is process-led
digital execution.
Your hotel digitisation project is an interesting case. What problem was
the client trying to solve and how did digital engineering change the outcome?
In hotels, comfort is the core requirement. Whether it is a 300-key or
500-key property, the guest experience depends heavily on MEP systems: HVAC,
electrical, plumbing, domestic water supply and heating. The challenge is that
these systems are often not coordinated early enough with architectural and
structural elements. Service corridors become especially critical because heavy
MEP systems pass through them. By adopting BIM and a digital-first approach,
Desapex was able to improve coordination at the design stage itself, reducing
the risk of clashes, rework and operational issues later. In hotel projects,
this directly supports the end goal: a smoother guest experience through more reliable
comfort, water supply and building services.
Where does BIM create the highest RoI today – design, construction, cost
control or operations?
The highest RoI is not limited to one stage. BIM creates value across
design, construction and operations if it is treated as a lifecycle framework.
The owner is the biggest beneficiary because the cash flow begins with the
owner. But the benefit moves from owner to designer, designer to contractor,
and contractor to operations and maintenance. The challenge is that the
industry still looks at BIM in silos. The real value comes when information
flows across the entire lifecycle.
Can you share specific RoI indicators from BIM, ISO 19650 and digital
twin adoption?
We are careful with headline numbers, but the value is consistent. Clash
detection is the most measurable benefit, as resolving conflicts in the model
reduces rework in critical areas such as service corridors and plant rooms. On
one hotel project, coordinating heavy MEP runs at the design stage helped avoid
cutting and re-routing of ductwork later.
For data centres, the gain is in sequencing. When a project is built
column by column, simulation helps avoid civil, MEP and architectural
mismatches that can affect timelines. ISO 19650 reduces the rework of information
— the time lost finding files or recreating data. Digital twins extend the
value into operations through energy optimisation and predictive maintenance.
These gains are achievable, but they depend on disciplined execution.
In complex projects like data centres, airports and industrial
facilities, what execution risks can digital engineering reduce most
effectively?
In data centres, even a small mismatch between MEP, civil and
architectural systems can disrupt timelines. Digital engineering helps visualise
and coordinate sequencing, especially because data centres are often built
column by column based on demand and commercial requirements. It also supports
future expansion, because large data centres are not built fully from Day 1.
Why should developers and EPC contractors care about ISO 19650-compliant
information management?
Earlier, there was confusion around BIM levels, LOD and model
requirements. ISO 19650 helps demystify digital delivery by showing how
information should be structured and exchanged across design, construction,
operations, maintenance and safety. For developers and EPC contractors working
on major capital projects, it provides a flexible framework for lifecycle
information management.
What roadmap should contractors and developers follow for digital
transformation?
We treat it as a maturity journey, not a software purchase. The first
step is to define information requirements: what data is needed, in what format
and at what stage. Then, prove the approach through one contained pilot before
scaling.
The next steps are to establish a common data environment with
discipline, layer ISO 19650 into the workflow, plan digital handover from Day
1, and then commission the operational twin with one or two high-value use
cases. The main pitfalls are buying technology before fixing the process, weak
CDE discipline, under-budgeting training and treating handover as an
afterthought. Technology-led projects are often the ones that fail.
What measurable business outcomes should clients expect from investing
in digital engineering?
The key outcomes are productivity, better decision-making, reduced
rework and long-term asset value. Digital engineering allows issues to be
resolved during design rather than after materials, manpower and money have
already been deployed onsite. It also reduces data loss between stages. When
designers, contractors and operators work in silos, data is recreated
repeatedly. That redundancy is a hidden cost.
What are the main barriers to BIM adoption, and how is AI being used?
The barriers are more human than technical. They include technology-led
adoption without process, skills gaps, cultural inertia and a supply chain that
is only as digital as its least-digital subcontractor.
Resistance usually comes from site teams and senior project managers
comfortable with 2D, subcontractors with no incentive to invest, and sometimes
clients who want digital handover but do not fund the information management
behind it.
AI is already useful in repetitive work such as drawings, modelling and
quantity take-offs. A take-off that once took days can now be largely extracted
in a fraction of the time, with the estimator moving from counting to
validating. But the limits matter: poor input gives poor output, ambiguity
remains a challenge, and human validation stays critical.
What sectors are currently driving Desapex’s pipeline and where do you
see stronger growth?
We see strong demand coming from real estate, data centres,
semiconductors and critical infrastructure. In India, developers and
contractors are moving beyond software-led BIM adoption and are now looking at
process-level digital transformation. Desapex is doing ISO 19650 process
consulting for leading real-estate developers such as Prestige, Sobha and
Brigade, helping them build standard operating processes that align with
technology.
Going ahead, growth will be driven by common data environments and AI,
with repetitive tasks such as drawings, quantity take-offs and modelling
becoming faster and more automated, while human validation remains critical.